Ethical Dilemma: Approach for Solutions to the dilemma

Dealing with employee behavior and complex working environments require an integrated application of the widely accepted practices of the society. The stages of moral development, the descriptive, normative, and the stakeholder salience models offer viable arguments on the best solutions to the dilemma. The most conspicuous approach to addressing the challenge entails the employment of moral reasoning (Marnburg, 2001). The practice establishes the foundations of ethical behavior by guiding the culprit to weigh out the available options as dictated a particular situation as analyzed by our USA Marketing management assignment help experts. Lawrence Kohlberg's phases of moral development are a product of the conglomerated ideas brought forth by the descriptive, normative, and stakeholder salience model.

The actions taken against the case can be subjected to moral and ethical considerations to comprehend their legitimacy. The conflicting perspectives point out the flaws in the manager’s decision to relocate or terminate the contract of the female employee. According to the stakeholder salience model, the decision made on a particular matter depends on the power, legitimacy, and urgency of the issue(Myllykangas, Kujala,& Lehtimäki, 2010).  Within the allocated powers, the supervisor can exercise the assigned jurisdiction to execute any decision that favors both parties. For instance, either of the mentioned actions would settle the case of employee sensitivity. Even though contract termination or relocation interferes with the employee’s mental and psychological serenity, the decision relieves the female worker the stress and discomfort emanating from the harassment. Furthermore, the exercise of power by the employer expresses the legitimacy and urgency of the action as per research done by our special UK strategy management assignment help online experts. A similar argument is brought forth in the categorical perspective and the Aristotle Virtue Ethics of the normative theory. The former embraces application of rationalmeasures that benefit both parties while the latter advocates for upholding the promises as long as the situation at hand fosters happiness. Proper knowledge of models would, therefore, justify the credibility of the solution.

Subjecting the ethical dilemma to analysis highlights people’s attitudes towards the action. The descriptive theory of ethics upholds that the morality of a decision can be debated and agreed upon through stakeholder consensus. The intrinsic property of the method is the in-depth study of people’s perception and subsequently making a conclusion based on the most preferred path. Hence, the application of the theory settles the impasse by adopting the decision resulting from the views of the virtuous majority. Moreover, applying the Stoic-Virtue ethics theory would shape the manager’s decision by controlling the immediate emotions (Aranzadi, 2011). Distractions among workers have a direct impact on the average performance. Therefore, the integrated application of the models offers a variety of strategies vital for addressing the unprecedented eventuality.

In conclusion, the complexity of the business environment requires sound management techniques to facilitate justified response to contingencies. More accurate, the workplace surroundings create a customized behavior among the employees. Therefore, the introduction of alienentities might affect the mental and psychological capacities of the workers. The resulting decision by the management is hence subject to ethical and moral analysis to ascertain the level of compliance as per findings got by our business law case study assignment help experts. The most suitable solutions to the stalemate entail consideration of the moral reasoning as advocated for by Lawrence Kohlberg's phases of moral development. The justification of the adopted choice is based on the utilization of the theories of ethics in which the philosophers present varying yet dependable accounts useful for solving problematic scenarios in the contemporary business sphere. The descriptive, normative, and the stakeholder salience theories offer perspectives whose intersection gives justified reasons for actions taken by the firm management unit.